首页> 外文OA文献 >The visibility of agricultural subsidies and market illusions in the Common Agricultural Policy: Some evidence from farmers’ views in Germany, Portugal and the United Kingdom
【2h】

The visibility of agricultural subsidies and market illusions in the Common Agricultural Policy: Some evidence from farmers’ views in Germany, Portugal and the United Kingdom

机译:共同农业政策中农业补贴的可见性和市场错觉:德国,葡萄牙和英国农民观点的一些证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article demonstrates that the design and nature of agricultural support schemes has an influence on farmers’ perception of their level of dependence on agricultural support. While direct aid payments inform farmers about the extent to which they are subsidised, indirect support mechanisms veil the level of subsidisation, and therefore they are not fully aware of the extent to which they are supported. To test this hypothesis, we applied data from a survey of 4,500 farmers in three countries: the United Kingdom, Germany and Portugal. It is demonstrated that indirect support, such as that provided through artificially high consumer prices, gives an illusion of free and competitive markets among farmers. This ‘visibility’ hypothesis is evaluated against an alternative hypothesis that assumes farmers have complete, or at least a fairly comprehensive level of, information on agricultural support schemes. Our findings show that this alternative hypothesis can be ruled out.
机译:本文表明,农业支持计划的设计和性质会影响农民对其对农业支持的依赖程度的认识。虽然直接援助金向农民告知了他们的补贴程度,但间接支持机制掩盖了补贴的水平,因此他们并不完全了解他们获得支持的程度。为了检验这一假设,我们应用了来自三个国家(英国,德国和葡萄牙)的4,500名农民的调查数据。事实证明,间接支持,例如通过人为地高昂的消费者价格提供的支持,给农民带来了自由和竞争性市场的幻想。该“可见性”假设是根据另一个假设进行评估的,该假设假设农民具有完整或至少相当全面的农业支持计划信息。我们的发现表明,可以排除这种替代假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号